- Carney 'Responsible' Candidates Release Documents - Huffington Post
In this article, Art Laffer discusses the correlation between the amount of stimulus governments tried and their real GDP from 2007-2009.
- The Real Stimulus Record - WSJ (Laffer)
First, we need to go back to 6th grade algebra and recall the linear equation:
f(x) = mx + b;
As you recall, m is the slope of the line, b is the y-intercept. So now let's look at the equation returned from this line and see what its telling us.
f(x) = -1.4710241035x - 0.0382080897
The first thing to note is the value of b is a negative number here. So, assuming that national governments didn't increase spending at all from 2007-2009, this implies that their real GDP would have still been negative. This implies that the world's economy during this stretch stunk... and I think we all knew that already. The number that jumps out here though is that the slope, m, is a negative number. This says that as a government increased stimulus spending over this 3 year period, there was a muliplying NEGATIVE effect on real GDP. For every $1 the government "stimulated", they actually reduced production by $1.50. That's even more incredible when you consider that government spending IS factored in to the GDP number.
So the next time you hear a Keynesian talk about a "multiplier effect", you can agree with them. This shows however that the multiplier is negative.
In other news that is worth a read:
- Four Little Words - WSJ (Strassel)
- Slow Recovery or Failed Agenda - WSJ (Lazear)

No comments:
Post a Comment