STIMULUS PACKAGE
- My Bipartison Stimulus - WSJ
- No Bipartison Support for House Stimulus Bills - WSJ
- Stimulus Aids Illegal Immigrants - Breitbart
GLOBAL WARMING
Just one man who has turned in his butter churn in search of some answers. The purpose of this blog is so that I can have one repository for all thoughts and articles that interest me. If you're here, hopefully you'll find it useful too.
(NOTE: some WSJ links open to partial articles, if you Google the title it will link to the full article)
GLOBAL WARMING
The ridiculousness of Obama and the Democrats's now nearly $900 trillion stimulus bills continues to mount. I'm at a complete loss these days that American's are putting up with this irresponsibility on the part of our elected officials. On the one hand, the people are screaming foul because of "golden parachutes", corporate jets and the excessive spending by corporate executives. In and of itself holding executives accountable is not a bad thing, in fact, wanting fiscal responsibility is prudent. But why then are we turning a blind eye to the gross excesses in our own government? The government spends and wastes far more money than any company could ever dream of. It seems to me the American people are hypocrites if we are going to lambaste CEO's all the while waiting for the federal government to waste more and more tillions of dollars on bailouts and economic "stimulus". Take a look at some of the crap being put in this "stimulus" bill:
I found those by looking over the bill for 5 minutes. I hate to think what I'd find if I looked harder. But please tell me, how does any of that stimulate the economy? It won't, that's the problem. Yet we lemmings blindly allow our elected officials to stuff the bills with these bloated and horribly wasteful earmarks.
UPDATE 1/29/09:
Here's the complete list of pork...
Americans are a fickle lot. I found this poll rather interesting. I remember 6 months ago when gas was $4/gallon and everyone wanted "Big Oil" hung from the gallows and energy independence was the mantra being sung from the rooftops. Not to mention how illegal immigration was huge a year. Now, not so much. The one bright spot is that people are actually starting to see global warming for what it is, a load of crap.
Other articles:
RUSH:Here, folks, if you haven't it heard I'm sorry to belabor this, grab sound bite 31. This sound bite is what has prevented me from getting to any other sound bites today. I think I'm the only one here who has caught this. I'm sure there will be others as the day goes on. This is Barack Obama, this is the president of the United States announcing his -- capital H, capital I, capital S -- his executive order this morning.
OBAMA: In order to effect the appropriate disposition of individuals currently detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo, uh, and promptly to close the detention facility at Guantanamo consistent with the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and interests of justice, I hereby order. And we then we will then provide, uh, the process whereby Guantanamo will be closed no later than, uh, one year from now. We will be... Uhhh.... Ummm.... Is there a separate executive order, Greg, with respect to how we're going to dispose of the detainees? Is that it, eh, uh, what we're doing?
CRAIG: We'll set up a process!
OBAMA: We will be setting up a process, uh, whereby this is going to be taking place.RUSH: What am I supposed to do here? Am I supposed to pretend this isn't happening, "Gee, I hope he figures this out and succeeds"? He's reading his own executive order, and in the middle of it he stops to ask his lawyer, Greg Craig, who represented Castro and the father of Elian Gonzalez in Cuba, (doing Obama impression) "Greg, uh, how we gonna handle the detainees here, what are we going to do?" "Oh, a process is going to be worked out," and then Obama repeats it as though nobody heard what Craig said. "We'll have a process, process going to be worked out." The second executive order was basically the process, which was a "we don't have a clue" executive order. Well, you know, I think they probably think Greg Craig is so smart he could probably be Treasury secretary, and he's paid his taxes. Look, play 32. It happened again. It happened again in the next sound bite with the next executive order. What am I supposed to do here?
OBAMA: What we're doing here is to set up a special interagency task force on detainee disposition. They are going to provide me with information in terms of how we are able to deal in the disposition of some of the detainees that may be currently in Guantanamo that we cannot transfer to other countries, who could pose a serious danger to the United States, uh, but we cannot try because of various problems related to evidence, uh, in a Article 3 court. So this task force is going to provide us with, uh, a series of recommendations on that. Is that correct, Greg?
CRAIG: That's right. And detainee policy going forward.
OBAMA: And detainee policy going forward so that we don't find ourselves in these kinds of situations, uh, in the future.
CRAIG: And there is clear guidance for the military as well.
OBAMA: And that we are providing clear guidance to our military in terms of how to deal with it.
RUSH: I'm speechless. I'm just dumbfounded. Two executive orders in a row, he doesn't know what's in them, gotta turn to Craig Greg. Craig tells him and Obama repeats it as though nobody can hear it. See, I thought Obama was the editor of the Harvard Law Review. He's supposed to be smarter than Greg Craig. He taught constitutional law up there at the University of Chicago, right next door to Bill Ayers. Yeah, you would think he'd be pretty good at this legal stuff. He's an author. He wrote his own books. Ahem. He didn't know what was in at least two of his executive orders today. What am I supposed to do? Am I not supposed to mention this? "Give him a chance, Rush. Wait 'til he really screws up. Give him a chance. We all want the country to succeed." Well, Obama's policies succeeding do not mean success for the country, and that's the bottom line. I want Obama's policies to fail. That will equal success for the country. So, see, the process here, the process was always the issue, so they say they're going to shut Guantanamo in a year, and they don't tell us the process, cause they don't have a plan!
UPDATE 1/14/09
Oh the weather outside is frightful, but global warming is so delightful....
UPDATE 1/15/09
UPDATE 1/16/09
And lest we forget what happened in Washington state 4 years ago.
One last thing. I've had some friends tell me that complaining about how Franken has "won" this election is no different than what the Democrats were saying about the Florida debacle. You remember the liberal mantra "Bush was selected, not elected." The liberals back then are making the same claims that I'm making now with this race, that the courts are in essensce selecting Franken despite what the voters wanted. The two situations are not the same though. Here's the difference. In 2000, Al Gore went to court in an effort to recount a bunch of absentee ballots that were not counted on election day. The reason they were not counted is because they were not delivered to the precincts in time. I touched on this in one of my previous posts, but absentee ballots must all be turned into the precincts by election night. The only possible reason to put an extension in place is if the state was lax in sending out the absentee ballots on time. In Florida's defense, all the ballots were sent out on time. So while the Florida Supreme Court agreed to recount these absentee ballots, the challenge to the US Supreme Court overruled the states decision. In no way did the US Supreme Court rule in favor of Bush, they simply upheld the law. So the claims that Bush was "selected" and not "elected" is just plain false. The situation in Minnesota is completely different.